With mortality rates of anywhere from 30% to 60% and an ability to fight off most antibiotics, health care professionals sound the alarm when they spot the Superbug Candida auris in their facility. Investigators with the University of British Columbia found that immediate implementation of stringent infection prevention and control measures at one hospital in the greater Vancouver area stopped the spread of this deadly fungal infection, limiting it to only 4 patients. Investigators say that event was the first outbreak of C. auris in Canada.
“Infection control measures, including surveillance, education, cleaning/disinfection, patient cohorting, isolation, and hand hygiene, effectively contained the outbreak; it was declared over within 2 months,” they write in a pre-print study in the American Journal of Infection Control (AJIC).
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), the spread of C. auris these days may be aided by all the attention given to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), and that people with COVID-19 are particularly vulnerable to C. auris.
The outbreak in the AJIC study began at the 218-bed community hospital in August 2017. The first patient had just returned from India and went to the hospital for post-surgical complications for pancreatitis. C. auris was found in ascitic fluid that was drained from the patient. Health care providers thought it resulted from colonization rather than infection. However, subsequently, 3 other patients—men from 61- to 89-years old—were found to have C. auris.
“After the third case was identified, a decision was made in conjunction with the medical health officer for the region to declare an outbreak of C. auris in the ICU of the facility,” the study states. “Efforts were undertaken to educate staff on the risks of transmission of the organism and reinforce standard infection control procedures.”
Staff from different departments huddled daily, and physicians conducted one-on-one education sessions with hospital employees.
“A multidisciplinary team was formed which included representation from IPAC [infection prevention and control], public health, hospital communications and administration, clinical teams, and the BCCDC [British Columbia Centre for Disease Control],” the study states. “Daily debriefs and reports were dispersed by the IPAC team, while weekly meetings were held with the multidisciplinary team to communicate updates and coordinate further outbreak interventions. The team engaged national and international colleagues to solicit advice and support.”
As the CDC notes, one of the problems with battling C. auris is that it can be difficult to spot. “Whole-genome sequencing conducted by our federal public health colleagues provided molecular epidemiological evidence linking the cases,” the study states. “It is unclear, however, as to how the C. auris strain was introduced into the facility. One patient expired during the outbreak secondary to causes unrelated to C. auris; the remaining patients were all eventually discharged home in stable condition.”
The reason C. auris often eludes detection is because laboratories sometimes have difficulties identifying the C. auris yeast.
“In contrast to other outbreaks described in the literature, we were able to limit transmission to only four patients,” the study states. “Immediate infection control measures that were implemented included contact isolation, exclusive use of cleaning agents with sporicidal activity, contact tracing, weekly ward surveillance cultures, de-cluttering, frequent laundering of patient linens and gowns, and staff education. Later in the course of the outbreak, chlorhexidine washes of C. auris colonized patients were implemented, but it is unclear as to whether this contributed to the cessation of transmission.”
Investigators note how C. auris represents not only a threat, but a growing threat.
“Our experience demonstrates that timely detection of the organism and rapid implementation of infection control measures are capable of limiting transmission; however, there are currently few guidelines to advise on strategies for effective admission screening protocols.”